I've chosen the article "Real brands in imaginary
worlds: investigating players’ experiences of brand placement in digital
games" by Mike Molesworth published in "Journal of Consumer
behavior" (Issue 5, 355-366). This article has 36 citations according to
Google Scholar.
In the first place I’ve found this article interesting
because of the chosen research method: author used qualitative approach and
conducted focused interviews with game players. In this study Molesworth tries
to explore how the context of gameplay effects on the players attitude towards
the brand placement? We can see that this research question requires the
qualitative study, so the research design suits well to the purpose of the
study.
I need to mention that I've read a variety of
publications on the topic of consumer attitude towards placements in various
media and most of them apply quantitative methods. Usually researchers try to
understand how much attention consumers pay to the placements, whether they
think positive about placed brands or not by conducting surveys. But in the
case of games it is essential to consider not only "perception" of
the brand message, but also interaction with brands since it is possible in
virtual reality. Context of the placement becomes more important than ever.
Molesworth worked with 5 focus-groups of players aged
19 to 38, during each of experiments 6 people were involved in discussion and
collective playing experience. Despite the fact that the sample size is large
enough and it proves the reliability of the results, I have suggestion about
the recruiting of groups for the study. Groups of 6 were formed at random, when
it could be more beneficial to recruit group by some criteria: for instance,
female versus male players, adult players versus young adults and etc.
Nevertheless, this does not diminish the quality of
the study. The main focus was made on comparison of attitudes towards brand
placement in games of different genres. Author came to conclusion that brands
appeared in racing simulators were welcomed by users and the brands in
strategic life-simulation games (like Sims) may become a matter to reflect on:
some users compare their real-life consumption experience with the virtual
world.
To conclude, the monomethod study may be improved by
applying criteria for sampling. Also it could be complemented by other methods
to achieve more detailed results on interaction with brands. For instance,
personal interviews could be used to analyze the emotional connection with
brands which probably wouldn’t be disclosed in group discussion. The limitation
of focus groups is an effect of “group averaging” when respondents may support
the opinion of the most competent member of the group without sharing own
feelings.
The article “Comics, Robots, Fashion and Programming:
outlining the concept of actDresses” by Fernaeus & Jacobsson appeared to be
almost a revelation for me. I’ve used to customize my electronic devices in
order to make the usual operations with them less “automatic” and more
“human-like”, but I had to idea that this practice may become an objective of
scientific research. When I firstly looked thought this article it wasn’t even
clear for me how study of actDressing can be related to the development of the
real robotic systems?
I didn’t know that much about contemporary robotics so
I was really amazed with the abilities of Pleo dinosaur. If I understood
correctly one of the practical implementations of this study is possibility to
“teach” Pleo to switch to the sleeping mode when the owner of the electronic
pet puts the pajama on it. I wasn’t even aware that such well-developed
sensitivity is already possible for robots!
From this article I’ve learned that not only textual
or symbolic systems may be used to control the robotic systems, but also the
physical system of gestures and acts. The concept itself was brand new for me,
because I wasn’t aware about this technology in the first place. Before I’ve
read this article the simple voice recognition by robots seemed to be pretty
innovative technology for me. But now we passed this stage and machines already
can recognize our gestures. So we can interact with robots using another
communication model, but further development of technology requires certain
theoretical framework. Fernaeus & Jacobsson proved that semiotics can
provide the approach in order to determine which cultural/symbolic acts can be
used in human-computer interaction.
This whole usage of symbolics really fascinated me, I already knew that a lot of system are relying on that kind of technical communication. For example traffic signs can be read by cameras in cars and then will be shown in the display of the car. Did you ever experienced with this comic style or with these symbolic systems?
ОтветитьУдалить